For the first time in 10 years Clarence Thomas asked a question from the bench!
This may not be big news for most people, but for a SCOTUS( Supreme Court of the United States) Law junky like me, this is big news. Clarence Thomas has stated that the oral arguements generally do not matter in a case and that all of the case is left to the briefs. This is a valid point. When a case reaches the SCOTUS both parties submit briefs on the matter(which can be hundreds of pages) on the question before the court. They then argue the case in front of the court giving both sides 30 minutes. Today, however, he broke his silence and asked a few questions in a gun case.
http://ift.tt/1o3tuNK
https://twitter.com/speedingticketk
http://ift.tt/1nTk8nt;
http://ift.tt/1KV05dw
All information provided by this site, including summaries and articles on legal topics, is general in nature and provided for informational purposes only. This information is not intended as legal advice, and should not be taken as such. Legal advice involves an attorney’s application of legal knowledge and judgment to specific facts and circumstances presented by a client. Before providing specific advice, a lawyer may need to conduct legal research and/or obtain additional facts. Nonlawyers should therefore not draw conclusions about what may be legally required, permissible, or advisable based solely upon consultation of general sources of legal information, including this and other law firm websites, without first seeking appropriate legal advice.
https://twitter.com/speedingticketk
http://ift.tt/1nTk8nt;
http://ift.tt/1KV05dw
All information provided by this site, including summaries and articles on legal topics, is general in nature and provided for informational purposes only. This information is not intended as legal advice, and should not be taken as such. Legal advice involves an attorney’s application of legal knowledge and judgment to specific facts and circumstances presented by a client. Before providing specific advice, a lawyer may need to conduct legal research and/or obtain additional facts. Nonlawyers should therefore not draw conclusions about what may be legally required, permissible, or advisable based solely upon consultation of general sources of legal information, including this and other law firm websites, without first seeking appropriate legal advice.
via Blogger http://ift.tt/1XVQtqv
from WordPress http://ift.tt/1oTtYH1
via IFTTT
No comments:
Post a Comment